When a U.S. Air Force pilot ejected from his crashing F-15 Eagle  fighter jet and landed in rebel-held eastern Libya overnight Tuesday, he  soon found to his relief that he was in friendly hands.                 
"He was a very nice guy," Libyan businessman Ibrahim Ismail told Newsweek of the initially quite anxious American pilot.  "He came to free the Libyan people." Rebel officials dispatched a  doctor to attend to the pilot and presented him with a bouquet of  flowers, according to Newsweek.
But the U.S. government, now engaged in a fourth day  of air strikes against Libyan regime military targets, does not know  very much about the rebels who now see it as a friendly ally in their  fight to overthrow Muammar Gadhafi.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held a  45-minute, closed-door meeting with Mahmoud Jibril, a leader of the  newly formed Libyan opposition Interim National Council in a luxury  Paris hotel earlier this month. But in a clear signal of America's  wariness about all the unknowns, Clinton gave no public statement after  their meeting and did not appear in photographs with the rebel leader.  (By contrast, a week earlier French President Nicholas Sarkozy bestowed  formal diplomatic recognition on the Council and was photographed  shaking hands with its emissaries Jibril and Ali Essawi on the steps of  the Elysee Palace.)
Middle East policy watchers note a glaring disconnect between the  buoyant expectations of some rebel supporters that the international  military coalition will provide direct air support and the insistance of  U.S. military commanders that their mandate allows for no such thing.
The coalition mission doesn't include protecting  forces opposed to Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi, Gen. Carter Ham, the  commander of U.S. Africa Command, told reporters Monday. His mission,  Ham said, is narrowly confined to preventing Gadhafi forces from  attacking civilians, getting Gadhafi's forces to pull back from  rebel-held towns, and allowing civilians humanitarian access to food,  water, and electricity/gas supplies, Ham said.
So who are the Libyan rebels with whom we now seem  (for better or for worse) to be joined with in a shared fight against  Gadhafi?
One view has it that the Libyan rebels are basically  peaceful protesters who found their demonstrations against Gadhafi met  with bullets and had no choice but to resort to violence.
"The protesters are nice, sincere people who want a  better future for Libya," Human Rights Watch Emergencies Director Peter  Bouckaert told  South Africa's Business Day. "But their strength is also their  weakness: they aren't hardened fighters, so no one knows what the end  game will be."
"This is not really a civil war between two equal  powers--it started as a peaceful protest movement and was met with  bullets," Bouckaert continued. "Now you have a situation where you have a  professional and heavily equipped army fighting a disorganized and  inexperienced bunch of rebels who stand little chance against them."
Still, the rebels are largely unknown to the American  government, despite initial tentative meetings such as Clinton's and  some meetings held by U.S. Ambassador to Libya Gene Cretz with  opposition representatives. (Cretz is now working out of the State  Department, as the United States has withdrawn its diplomatic presence.)  Last week, President Barack Obama appointed an American diplomat, Chris  Stevens, to be the U.S. liaison to the Libyan opposition.
"We don't have the comfort level with the rebels,"  said the National Security Network's Joel Rubin, a former State  Department official. "We certainly know some things about them, had  meetings. It's not as if there's complete blindness. But I don't think  at this stage the comfort level is there for that kind of close  coordination."
But the Libyan rebels seem to have found western  consultants who have offered advice on words the West wants to hear. On  Tuesday, the Interim National Council issued just such a reassuring  statement from their rebel stronghold of Benghazi.
"The Interim National Council is committed to the  ultimate goal of the revolution which is to build a democratic civil  state, based on the rule of law, respect for human rights including  guarantying equal rights and duties for all citizens," the Council said  in their statement. "A state based on the rule of law and good  governance where people live in a safe and secure environment and  promotes equality between men and women."
The Interim National Council also "reaffirms that  Libya's foreign policy will be based on mutual respect and common  interest and reaffirms its respect for all Libya's previous bilateral  and multilateral commitments," the group said. "Libya will be a state  that fully respect the International law and International Humanitarian  Law and participate in the international relations responsibly and  constructively in good faith."
(Photo, top: Libyan rebels on the road between  Benghazi and Ajdabiyah: Suhaib Salem/Reuters. Photo, middle: France's  President Nicolas Sarkozy shakes hands with Libyan Interim National  Council emissaries Mahmoud Jibril (R) and Ali Essawi after a meeting at  the Elysee Palace in Paris March 10, 2011: Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters)
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theenvoy/20110322/ts_yblog_theenvoy/who-are-the-libyan-rebels-u-s-tries-to-figure-out
 
No comments:
Post a Comment